OPENING REMARKS BY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE CHRISTINA ROCCA AT THE TALK PROGRAM ON “NEPAL-U.S. RELATIONS TODAY? ORGANIZED JOINTLY BY THE INSTITUTE OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND THE AMERICAN CENTER
TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2005, AT 15:00 HOTEL YAK AND YETI, KATHMANDU, NEPAL
Mr. Pandey, Dr. Lohani, distinguished guests:
I
am very happy that I was able to come to Nepal at the right time to
participate in this talk program and to inaugurate the invigorated
American Library now located in the West Wing of this building.
It has been a year since my last visit to Nepal. Much has
changed, but the fundamental crisis confronting Nepal remains the
same. I am meeting with many government officials, politicians,
media, and members of civil society during my short visit to discuss
both these changes, and how Nepal can best cope with its political and
developmental problems.
The United States has considered
itself a close friend of Nepal since diplomatic relations were first
established in 1947. In 1951, our economic assistance and
Fulbright programs began here. Our total development assistance
over the years amounts to 400 million dollars. Our security
assistance over the past four years, including a one-time appropriation
of 12 million dollars in 2002, amounts to 22 million dollars
overall. In 1952, the first American library was opened by the
then U.S. Information Service. In 1962, the Peace Corps program
was established in Nepal. I am very happy to say that all
programs continue to flourish – with the exception of the Peace Corps,
which had to suspend operations last October due to security
concerns. And I hope that the Peace Corps will be able to resume
operations as soon as that is feasible.
American
development assistance to Nepal has increased dramatically over the
past two years, jumping from $24 million to $42 million annually.
Over half of this increased amount -- $23 million -- is earmarked for
basic health programs – from the Vitamin A program that saves the lives
of 25,000 children each year to HIV/AIDS awareness and
prevention. Other projects involve support for democratic
institution building, such as judicial reform programs,
anti-trafficking, generating employment and income opportunities in
rural areas to promote peace, facilitating agricultural market
development, and last but not least, hydropower development.
However,
our assistance activities, together with the efforts of other
international donors, are now at risk from a brutal Maoist
insurgency. The Maoists have made clear their intention to impose
a one-party “people’s republic,” collectivize agriculture, “reeducate”
so-called class enemies, and export their revolution to neighboring
states. We feel that such a regime would almost certainly
threaten stability in the region. Much if not all of the progress
that the United States and others have helped Nepal accomplish in terms
of both development and democratization would be negated.
In
my visits to Nepal I have taken the opportunity to make sure that the
government was aware of our support for their efforts to counter the
Maoists. The United States has a strong interest in helping the
people of Nepal overcome this threat and deal with the country’s
serious developmental problems. Our goals for Nepal can be put
quite simply: we want Nepal to be a peaceful, prosperous and democratic
country where civil liberties and human rights are protected.
The
United States and other friends of Nepal have long believed it is
essential for Nepal’s legitimate political leaders to resolve the
longstanding political impasse that has prevented a united effort to
confront the two dangers facing Nepal – the Maoist insurgency and
underdevelopment. The key to accomplishing this is for the
legitimate political parties and the King to unite in a multi-party
democratic framework in order to confront the Maoists and address the
country’s serious developmental problems. Over the past several years
we have encouraged political party leaders and the King to follow this
course. We will continue to stress this message to the King and
to all political forces. We continue to believe that the events
of February 1 were a serious setback to accomplishing this
objective.
While we welcome the steps taken by His
Majesty’s Government to lift the State of Emergency and release
political leaders, we remain concerned about the reports of continuing
repression of civil liberties and additional arrests. We continue
to urge the government of Nepal to release all political detainees,
restore civil liberties, and reach out in a pro-active manner to the
political parties. At the same time, we urge the political
parties to work together and with the government. Their recent
announcement of a united front is an encouraging first step in this
process. But the need of the hour is reconciliation: to develop and
follow a joint roadmap to deal with the Maoists and work for a
peaceful, prosperous, and Nepal.
We remain
concerned about the widespread suffering of the Nepali people as a
result of the Maoist insurgency, from abuses and atrocities by Maoists
and also through human rights abuses by government security
forces. The recent Government agreement to allow a UN Human
Rights Office to begin operations in Nepal is a good first step, and we
expect there will be full cooperation with the Office. An
important focus of our engagement with the government of Nepal and its
security services will remain the critical need for increased respect
for human rights. We continue to check on military units to
ensure that none implicated in human rights violations receives U.S.
assistance. We have made it clear to the Government that we
expect to see appropriate, timely and transparent investigations of any
credible allegations of abuse and that failure to do so could
jeopardize our ability to continue assistance.
The
United States intends to continue our close relationship with Nepal and
build trade, investments, and tourism. We will gladly work with
all legitimate forces to make this a reality. The American people
and their representatives in Congress take Nepal’s best interests to
heart and watch developments closely. We in the Executive Branch
have to be able to tell them there is political will among all the
legitimate political elements to make progress toward peace and the
restoration of a true multi-party democracy, including elections at the
earliest possible time.
Thank you.